Editor:
Just cast one's mind back nine months to December 2012 when Delta council revealed mass public opposition to the Southlands proposal. At that time, 77 per cent opposed, with less than 20 per cent in favour.
Now our council, in its wisdom, has passed first and second reading to this proposal and it goes to public hearing late next month.
What has changed? Nothing as far as I can see.
The Century Group has promoted the Southlands development on two important concepts: 80 per cent of the land being generously donated to the municipality for agriculture and homes for first-time buyers with young families to increase our school enrollment.
Much has been said about Southlands being developed so residents could have cycling paths to the beach and around Boundary Bay. South Delta is not overly bike friendly and would not suddenly become "biking heaven" should this development proceed. I know, having cycled long distances in India, Spain and here where I use my bike to shop and commute.
Ninety-nine per cent of South Delta's adults do not use their bikes for all daily activities. For most, cycling is a fine weather recreational activity. Development of the Southlands will not lead to many giving up their cars in favour of bikes.
The Ipsos Reid survey that sampled 300 residents this spring clearly showed traffic and development are the most serious concerns. Why are we trying to make things worse knowing the community's pulse?
Rodney Asher
